Submission Guideline

All manuscripts as well as Invited/Special Session proposals and Open Tracks must be electronically submitted to conference email: esce_conf@163.com.

All papers will be accepted with the understanding that they will be presented at the conference. At least one author of each accepted paper will be required to register for ESCE24 before uploading the final version.

Conference papers in the full review procedure will be published in an edited volume of the proceedings of this event by publisher in open-access series.

The ESCE invites young authors who are giving papers at the ESCE2024 to apply for Developing Countries – Young Author Support consisting of waive of registration fees. More information please contact us at esce_conf@163.com.

Journal publications: the TPC of ESCE 2024 may screen presented papers with the purpose of recommending the authors to consider significantly extended versions in one of high-ranked journals

Submissions should be submitted without author information and also be anonymised regarding self-citations.

1. Submit your latest research paper to conference editorial office at esce_conf@163.com. please also leave your phone number for communication.
Submission Deadline: 31 August 2024
For example, "C-submission+Tel" or "Title+Tel". Authors are invited to submit your paper to online submission system.
"Please Note, Regular manuscript you submit to ESCE24 should not less than Six pages in length includes all firgures, equations, tables and references .Regular registration is within Seven pages. Extra pages will be charge."

-Authors are asked to follow the author-guidelines of the publisher and use the 1-column template provided on this page
-Basically, Correct and Sound;
-Original; (MANUSCRIPT has not been published elsewhere or submitted to other venues for simultaneous consideration)
-At least Oneauthor of each manuscript should present at thIs conference;
-In line with the scope of conference.
-A maximum of Two manuscripts per author can be accepted.
-No more than Five authors per manuscript.
-Self-citations should not exceed 15%.
-Authors are encouraged to refer to all aspects of publication ethics, we firmly believe that ethical conduct is the basic of any academic. Any act of Plagiarism or Academic misconduct is totally unacceptable and intolerated.

Title
The title should be concise and informative.
-Author information
The name(s) of the author(s), The maximum number of papers written by the same author(s) is limited to Six.
The affiliation(s) of the author(s), i.e. institution, (department), city, (state), country
A clear indication and an active e-mail address of the corresponding author, use "*".
-Abstract
Please provide an abstract of 150 to 250 words.
-Keywords
-Introduction
-Experimental details, includes Tables, figures and Equations
-Results and discussion
-Conclusion
-Acknowledgments
-References

Each manuscript is reviewed by one or more members of the Program Committee. On occasion, outside expert Reviewers may be consulted. Publication of a submitted manuscript is contingent on approval by the Reviewer.

Editors, Editorial Committee Members, and Reviews staff treat submitted manuscripts and all communication with authors as confidential. Authors and Reviewers must also treat communication as confidential.

Reviewers are asked to consider the following for every article published in ESCE conference proceeding:
Whether the article will be of value to a broad audience. The goal is to make all articles useful to specialists, scholars from other areas, and teachers and students. Reviewers are asked to make specific suggestions as to how the article can achieve this goal if revision is necessary.
Whether the citations broad and representative of the published primary literature.
Whether the abstract represents the whole article and is informative.
Whether the article well organized and easy to read.
Whether the illustrations and tables are effective.

Reviewers make a recommendation to:
Accept the article and publish with minor to moderate revisions;
Request significant revision followed by another review;
Reject the article; Reviewers can indicate whether the author may resubmit or not.

Finally, the reviewers can provide some free text observations which was given to the authors and also some free text private observations, made available only to the program chair. Conflicting reviews may require assignment of a new reviewer. In the end the program chairs decide. The author has a period for rebuttal, which triggers a workflow involving the chairs and the reviewers if necessary. All rebuttals are answered but decisions are final.